108th Helmholtz Open Science Newsletter
Issue of April 30, 2025
Dear Open Science enthusiasts,
This is the latest issue of the Helmholtz Open Science Newsletter brought to you by the Helmholtz Open Science Office. With this newsletter, we provide you with a regular overview of the most important open science developments.
We appreciate you forwarding this newsletter to anyone interested.
- 1. Advancing Research Assessment
- 2. BMBF and Alliance of Science Organizations Call for Respect for Academic Freedom
- 3. Current Developments on Diamond Open Access
- 4. Modular Reference Model for the Information Budget
- 5. SCOAP³ for Books: Sponsorship of Open Access Books Continues
- 6. Retrospective: RDA-DE Conference 2025
- 7. PIDs for Physical Objects: Workshop Showed Potentials
- 8. Impressions from E-Science-Tage 2025
- 9. Reproducibility in Action: Insights from the 4th Helmholtz Workshop
- 10. Software Quality Assurance: 6th Helmholtz Open Science Forum
- 11. On Our Own behalf: X Account Deleted
- Save the Dates
- Recommended Reading
- Imprint & License
- Stay up to date
1. Advancing Research Assessment
The discussion about a reform of research assessment with the aim of evaluating research achievements in a more transparent, diverse, and quality-oriented manner continues to gain momentum.
An important milestone in this process is the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), which advocates for abandoning the inappropriate use of journal-based metrics and promotes the fair and comprehensive assessment of scientific work. Five Helmholtz Centers (German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Forschungszentrum Jülich (FZJ), Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences Research (GFZ), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), and Max Delbrück Center (MDC)) have signed DORA and are committed to the further development of their research assessment processes and criteria. On occasion of DORA’s 12th birthday “A Practical Guide to Implementing Responsible Research Assessment at Research Performing Organizations” will be launched with three online panel sessions in May 2025 for the global community.
Since 2022, the Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA) promotes development of the research assessment methods and processes that recognise the diverse outputs, practices, and activities that maximize the quality and impact of research. The Helmholtz Open Science Office, like the MDC, is now one of the signatory institutions and contributes to several of CoARA’s Working Groups. In addition, Mathijs Vleugel, Head of the Helmholtz Open Science Office, has been elected to coordinate the CoARA German National Chapter starting March 2025.
The Helmholtz Task Group Research Assessment has recently been set up to support the further development of research assessment at the Helmholtz Association. Its aim is to create a platform to identify and share quality-oriented approaches for research assessment, and advance their further development and implementation within Helmholtz.
2. BMBF and Alliance of Science Organizations Call for Respect for Academic Freedom
In view of the political developments in the USA, concerns about respect for scientific freedom and the resulting impact on established collaborations are increasing. This also applies to the accessibility of certain research data, e.g., climate data, which is generated or hosted in the USA. Concerns about respect for academic freedom motivated the BMBF and the Alliance of Science Organizations to publish a commitment to academic freedom at the end of March 2025.
Certain research can be perceived as opposition by political power holders and consequently be disadvantaged or suppressed. Likewise, those in political power can specifically promote research whose results they expect to strengthen their interests. Both can constitute a violation of academic freedom. In democratically constituted states, academic freedom is not only protected by constitutional law, but this principle is also generally recognized by the political leadership. Despite these firewalls, protagonists of what are generally described as right-wing populist parties are openly attacking academic freedom.
A number of American universities and non-university research institutions perceive the actions of the current US government as a disregard for academic freedom and a rejection of a pluralistic society and are protesting against them: Recently, around 2000 members of the three national science academies in the United States signed an open letter of protest. In a further protest letter, the heads of more than 100 universities and non-university research institutions call on the Trump administration to change its policy towards scientific institutions. Peter Suber documents the Trump administration's actions against Open Science.
3. Current Developments on Diamond Open Access
In view of the criticism of the commercialization of open access as well as data tracking and AI exploitation by large publishers, the question of the autonomy of science is increasingly coming into focus. Consequently, diamond open access publication models, in which neither reading nor publishing fees are charged, as well as science-led and publicly funded publication infrastructures are gaining momentum.
The Helmholtz Association has various activities in the field of diamond open access, which involve the promotion of science-led publication models and publicly funded publication infrastructures. Examples include the “Diamond Thinking” project of the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) and the call for strengthening science-led publication infrastructures as part of the “Memorandum on the Open Access Transformation at the Helmholtz Association”. There are also currently numerous national and international developments and activities. This year, a DFG-funded, national Service Center Diamond Open Access (SeDOA) will be established for Germany to increase the efficiency of the diamond open access publication infrastructure in Germany and strengthen its international links. The European Diamond Capacity Hub (EDCH) has existed since the end of 2024 precisely to facilitate the networking of such and other national activities relating to diamond open access at European level. The EDCH is intended to support, strengthen and bring together the very heterogeneous and partly fragmented diamond open access landscape in Europe and also cover the objectives of the “Action Plan for Diamond Open Access”.
A new webpage on diamond open access from the Helmholtz Open Science Office provides information on the underlying concept and the activities within and beyond Helmholtz.
4. Modular Reference Model for the Information Budget
The DFG-funded project Transform2Open has published the Modular Reference Model for the Information Budget (in German only). As part of various participatory formats, a preliminary study was carried out to explore how library budgets, third-party funding, and other financial resources for information provision can be strategically combined under the concept of an information budget in the context of open access. The publication summarizes the key findings of this process and describes the framework conditions and success factors for information budgets.
The model is based on preliminary work carried out by the focus group information budget of open-access.network and other stakeholders. It can be used both as a checklist for identifying relevant cost elements and as a tool for initial cost recording. Furthermore, it enables scientific institutions to assess the development status of their information budget and to develop it further in a targeted manner. The publication is accompanied by a table that includes the developed modules. It also offers the opportunity to enter cost information and make an initial assessment. The file serves as a generic starting point and can be adapted according to local needs.
5. SCOAP³ for Books: Sponsorship of Open Access Books Continues
SCOAP³ (Sponsoring Consortium for Open Access Publishing in Particle Physics) is an international cooperation in the field of high-energy physics with the aim of converting traditional closed-access publications into open access. The SCOAP³ for Books initiative also provides financial support for the publication of monographs and textbooks. As the SCOAP³ consortium has now announced, almost 100 open access books have been published to date as part of the funding program. SCOAP³ for Books will be continued in 2025.
6. Retrospective: RDA-DE Conference 2025
The RDA-DE Conference 2025, organized by the Research Data Alliance Deutschland e.V in cooperation with the Helmholtz Open Science Office, took place at the GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences on February 18-19, 2025. The conference opened with a keynote speech on open science policy in France. The main topics of the conference were the use of research data and the presentation of the data competence centers funded by the BMBF.
The President of the Helmholtz Association presented the extensive activities in the Association to promote data-driven research. The “Helmholtz Information and Data Science Framework” was created in the Association across all research fields to strengthen expertise in dealing with research data. This structure, which is unique in Germany in the field of information and data science, networks experts, supercomputers, algorithms, data treasures, and services.
As was the case at the last RDA-DE conference, a presentation was also devoted to the topic of long-term archiving. In her presentation, Juliane Watson from the German Archaeological Institute drew attention to the fact that the topic of long-term archiving was given too little consideration in the design of the NFDI funding.
The presentation slides and the posters on display are available on the conference website. The venue and date for the RDA-DE Conference 2026 have already been set. The conference will take place on February 24-25, 2026, at the GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, as it has in previous years.
7. PIDs for Physical Objects: Workshop Showed Potentials
The DFG-funded project PID Network Germany organized a workshop in February 2025 that addressed the extension of the use of persistent identifiers (PIDs) to physical objects. The workshop focused on challenges and possibilities of using PIDs for e.g. biological sample material, drill core samples or cultural artifacts.
A wide range of presentations covered how physical objects are currently recorded in Germany, for example in the fields of catalysis research, plant genetics and crop research as well as archaeology. In addition, the importance of IGSNs (International Generic Sample Numbers) as PID for the scientific community was emphasized and their use for improving data availability and usability was illustrated. This was followed by intensive exchange formats on areas of application of PIDs, challenges and possible solutions. A particular focus was on the exchange of ideas for the development of a national PID roadmap. The event was multifaceted and offered plenty of time to gather information, network and exchange ideas. A summary and the contributions can be found in the project website.
The PID Network team also invites you to another event on May 7, 2025 in Hanover or online. This will focus on PIDs for academic events from the perspective of various stakeholders (program). The registration options can be found here.
8. Impressions from E-Science-Tage 2025
This year's E-Science-Tage took place from March 12 to 14, 2025 under the slogan “Research Data Management: Challenges in a Changing World”. As in previous years, the interdisciplinary conference on research data management (RDM) and open science was hosted at Heidelberg University and organized by the federal state initiative bwFDM with the participation of other institutions from Baden-Württemberg, including the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT). This year's conference focused on the challenges of RDM in the face of changing technical, infrastructural and geopolitical conditions.
A varied program awaited the approximately 340 participants from Germany and abroad who took part on site and online: The first day featured workshops, presentations, and a keynote on data stewardship, while the second day began with a keynote on data-driven modeling of the Earth system, followed by a comprehensive poster session as an exclusive program item. Key topics were the impact of artificial intelligence, budget cuts, and uncertainties in legal requirements on RDM. The program also highlighted aspects of data literacy and the reuse of research data. Not surprisingly, the activities of the National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI) were omnipresent. The conference concluded with a panel discussion on the future prospects and funding of research data management, which focused on the issue of data stewards as important specialists.
The projects PID Network Deutschland and PID4NFDI were represented with a joint presentation on the status quo and prospects of persistent identifiers (PIDs) in open science. (A conference report by the PID Network provides further insights into the conference.) The current funding period of the state initiative bwFDM runs until 2027. Therefore, next year it will certainly be possible to say again: “Nice here, but have you ever been to E-Science-Tage?”
9. Reproducibility in Action: Insights from the 4th Helmholtz Workshop
The 4th Helmholtz Workshop on Reproducibility brought together interested researchers and collaborators from academia at the Max Delbrück Center - Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology. The event was organized by the Max Delbrück Center, Helmholtz Information & Data Science Academy (HIDA) and the Helmholtz Open Science Office. The event featured keynotes by Altuna Akalin (MDC) on the reproducibility of software in the age of artificial intelligence and Frieder Paulus (University of Lübeck) on “Contextualization of reproducibility in the organization of academic work”. Participants then took part in practical workshops - one on achieving different levels of reproducibility and another on validating images - to acquire practical skills.
The workshop encouraged networking and concluded with a discussion on integrating reproducibility into research assessment, featuring experts from the Helmholtz Association and Charité. The event highlighted the importance of reproducibility for scientific integrity, trust and the future of health research and emphasized the community's commitment and collaborative efforts to improve procedures.
Further information on reproducibility at Helmholtz can be found here.
10. Software Quality Assurance: 6th Helmholtz Open Science Forum
Software Quality Assurance plays a crucial role within the research community to ensure the long-term usability, reproducibility, and transparency of research software. To support this endeavor within the Helmholtz Association, the Task Group Research Software and the Task Group Helmholtz Quality Indicators for Data and Software Products of the Working Group Open Science and the Helmholtz Open Science Office hosted the 6th iteration of the Helmholtz Research Software Forum.
The event took place from February 12 to 13, 2025 at Forschungszentrum Jülich and showed how structured steps can ensure the sustainable development, documentation and maintenance of software products. The program covered key topics such as the introduction and implementation of quality indicators for research software, hands-on sessions for problem identification and resolution, and updates on Helmholtz-wide software projects such as JuRSE and HiRSE. With contributions from various Helmholtz Centers, the forum provided a valuable platform for knowledge exchange and the development of common strategies to improve the quality of research software across the Association.
A report summarizing the presentations and discussions of the event has now been published.
11. On Our Own behalf: X Account Deleted
As part of a scientific community that is committed to openness, fact-based discourse, and the freedom of science, the Helmholtz Open Science Office had already ceased its involvement on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) at the end of 2023. After numerous German universities and scientific institutions also ended their activities on X in January 2025, we have now decided to delete our X account for good. We are happy to interact with you on Mastodon (@HelmholtzOpenScienceOffice@helmholtz.social), Bluesky (@helmholtzosoffice.bsky.social), and on LinkedIn.
Recommended Reading
Boehm, F., Euler, E., Klimpel, P., Rack, F., & Weitzmann, J. (Eds.). (2025). Creative Commons Public License (CCPL). Kommentar und Handbuch für die Rechtspraxis. Carl Grossmann Verlag. https://www.carlgrossmann.com/ccpl_kommentar/
Borgman, C. L., & Groth, P. (2025). From data creator to data reuser: distance matters. Harvard Data Science Review, accepted version. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.35d32cfc
Christ, S., Fritzsch, B., Grossmann, Y. V., Kempf, D., Linxweiler, J., Löffler, F., Riedl, L., Thiele, J. P., Wagner, A. S., Zanon, L., Assmann, C., Brömmel, D., Caspart, R., Dogan, M., Fillinger, S., Frangenberg, J., Franke, M., Frey, A., Hagenberg, J., … Wittke, S. (2025). Code for Science: Bessere Forschung durch bessere Forschungssoftwarekompetenzen. Code for Science: Bessere Forschung durch bessere Forschungssoftwarekompetenzen, Hannover, 02.-04.12.2024. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14273367
Ervens, B., Carslaw, K. S., Koop, T., & Pöschl, U. (2025). Opinion: Improved scientific discourse and quality assurance by interactive open access publishing with community-based multi-stage open peer review in an open science landscape. EGUsphere. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-419
Hopkins, K., & Sanders, K. (2025). Open access, open infrastructures, and their funding: learning from histories to more effectively enhance diamond OA ecologies for books. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.31274/jlsc.18284
Klebel, T., Traag, V., Grypari, I., Stoy, L., & Ross-Hellauer, T. (2025). The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review. Royal Society Open Science, 12(3), 241248. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241248
Riise, R. R., Schmidt, B., Lutz, J.-F., Bauin, S., & Tuuliniemi, A. (2025). Reflections on transformative agreements: from stagnant transitions to article quotas. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14718356
Stompor, T., Pampel, H., Boltze‐Fütterer, J., & Rusch, B. (2025). DeepGreen—A Data Hub for the Distribution of Scholarly Articles From Publishers to Open Access Repositories in Germany. Learned Publishing, 38(2), e70000. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.70000
Treadway, J., Labastida i Juan, I., Melinščak Zlodi, I., & Proudman, V. (2025). Building bridges to open access. Paths to institutional rights retention in Europe 2024. Project Retain. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15078315